Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?.

Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?.
This section contains 1,158 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Robert Brustein

SOURCE: "Albee and the Medusa Head," in New Republic, Vol. 147, No. 18, November 3, 1962, pp. 29-30.

In the following excerpt of a review of Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, Brustein recognizes Albee's talent for compelling and clever dialogue and his inventiveness, but also notes what he perceives as the author's failure to create a cohesive drama.

Edward Albee's new work embodies both the failings and the virtues of his previous plays. But its positive achievements are substantial, and I am finally beginning to regard this playwright's future with real expectation. Albee's technical dexterity has always been breathtaking—for sheer theatrical skill, no American, not even Williams, can match him—but like Williams, he has been inclined to falsify his native gifts, distorting experience through self-defensive reflecting mirrors. In Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf, Albee is still not looking the Gorgon smack in the eye. Still, he has conjured up its...

(read more)

This section contains 1,158 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Robert Brustein
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Robert Brustein from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.