A Midsummer Night's Dream | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 37 pages of analysis & critique of A Midsummer Night's Dream.

A Midsummer Night's Dream | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 37 pages of analysis & critique of A Midsummer Night's Dream.
This section contains 9,901 words
(approx. 34 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Urban Morn

SOURCE: Morén, Urban. “‘Antique Fable’ Epitomized by Puck.” English Language Notes 38, no. 1 (September 2000): 16-40.

In the following essay, Morén contends that Puck is a representative of sexuality in A Midsummer Night's Dream and examines the distinctive meanings of the word “Puck” in the text of the play in order to support this claim.

The application of a “digressive” approach to A Midsummer Night's Dream1 has made it possible to unearth Shakespeare's standpoint in one of the play's central issues. Thus several cruces, notably, “‘Puck's name’ … bear no barm … ‘tailor’ cries … cough … loffe,” are given plausible solutions, and, as a consequence, one of Puck's enigmatic passages unravels as a comment on the “imagination vs. reason” theme. In this semantic examination a few outings in other parts of “Shakespeareshire,” as well as extra-disciplinary dittos, have been necessary. These side-tracks encompass areas as diverse as: magical milk-theft as portrayed...

(read more)

This section contains 9,901 words
(approx. 34 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Urban Morn
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Urban Morén from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.