A Midsummer Night's Dream | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 17 pages of analysis & critique of A Midsummer Night's Dream.

A Midsummer Night's Dream | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 17 pages of analysis & critique of A Midsummer Night's Dream.
This section contains 4,713 words
(approx. 16 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Lou Agnes Reynolds and Paul Sawyer

SOURCE: Reynolds, Lou Agnes, and Paul Sawyer. “Folk Medicine and the Four Fairies of A Midsummer-Night's Dream.Shakespeare Quarterly 10, no. 4 (autumn 1959): 513-21.

In the following essay, Reynolds and Sawyer examine Titania's four fairy servants in A Midsummer Night's Dream—Cobweb, Peaseblossom, Mustardseed, and Moth—and contend that their presence represents the healing properties of folk medicine as well as its role in establishing a connection between the natural and supernatural world.

To the Elizabethans no subject, apart from love, was more appropriate to Midsummer's Night than folk medicine; or conversely, at no time could a reference to folk medicine be more opportunely introduced than on Midsummer's Night. It was believed that on this night of the summer solstice, plants were granted a magic power that they possessed at no other time of the year1 That Shakespeare was well acquainted with this mass of superstition is shown by his...

(read more)

This section contains 4,713 words
(approx. 16 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Lou Agnes Reynolds and Paul Sawyer
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Lou Agnes Reynolds and Paul Sawyer from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.