A Clean, Well-Lighted Place | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 27 pages of analysis & critique of A Clean, Well-Lighted Place.

A Clean, Well-Lighted Place | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 27 pages of analysis & critique of A Clean, Well-Lighted Place.
This section contains 5,605 words
(approx. 19 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by David Kerner

SOURCE: “The Ambiguity of ‘A Clean, Well-Lighted Place,’” in Studies in Short Fiction, Vol. 29, No. 4, Fall, 1992, pp. 561-74.

In the following essay, Kerner offers a “comprehensive demonstration of the accuracy of Hemingway's text.”

Since Warren Bennett's 13,000-word defense—concluding, “All printings of [“A Clean, Well-Lighted Place”] should, therefore—in fairness … most of all, to Hemingway—follow the 1965 emended text” (120)—has passed muster with Paul Smith,1 the earlier cries of “Enough!” were premature:2 a comprehensive demonstration of the accuracy of Hemingway's text is needed, lest we wake up one day to find the emendation enshrined in the Library of America. The need is evident too when Gerry Brenner can write: “must we know which waiter answers the question ‘How do you know it was nothing?’ with ‘He has plenty of money.’? I think not” (252-53). One cannot take this answer away from the younger waiter without redistributing 19 other speeches...

(read more)

This section contains 5,605 words
(approx. 19 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by David Kerner
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by David Kerner from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.