Many pre-conditions of the country of Russia may have helped lead to the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II after 300 years of Romanov rule. The very nature of the empire, such as the fact that it is huge...
Read more
"Without a revolutionary thought there can be no revolutionary movement."
~ Vladimir Ilyich
For Russia, the world was a very different place in the early twentieth century. Afte...
Read more
There are many factors that contributed to the eventual collapse of the Tsar's regime in March 1917; they are the Tsar's system of government, the military defeat and the opposition to the Tsar.
The ...
Read more
When the Provisional Government came to power in February 1917, it inherited many problems from the Tsarist era, as well as creating some of its own. They themselves did not really want to be in the p...
Read more
The social, economic and political conditions that existed in Russia in the early 20th century were long-term factors that led to the abdication of the Tsar. Between 1861 and 1900, the plot size for p...
Read more
The 19th century was a contrast from old to new, the old monarchies and feudal systems to the new capitalist world and democracy. The 19th century was the opening stage for the modern world. In ge...
Read more
Political, economical, and social conditions helped spark a revolution in Russia.
Political: Nicholas II was a weak and ineffective man; he had power and did not quite know how to use it. Like other...
Read more
I think the Tsar lost power due to mainly mutiny in the army. The army is a core part of a governor's rule and with the army on your side,a one can rule virtually any way that he /she pleases. The Tsa...
Read more
